Showing posts with label doctrine. Show all posts
Showing posts with label doctrine. Show all posts

An Open Letter to the 'Church of God'

This is an open letter to the self-styled 'Church of God', a gathering of people from the World Mission Society Church of God, and the students of Elohim Academy.


Dearest friends,

I had a good opportunity to sit and speak to two of your men who had been diligently walking around Jaya Mall. We talked for a good hour or so, and in that time, I learnt many things about what your 'church' is all about.

Correct me if I am wrong, but the following two points are what defines your 'church':
1. Jesus' second coming is in the person of Ang Sahng-hong, a South Korean.
2. The existence of a being call God the Mother.

Let us begin with the person of Jesus, for that is where we both hold common ground. You have been told that David is a prophecy of Jesus, and it was necessary for Jesus to emulate David's life, specifically 1Kings 2:11, which says that 'And the time that David reigned over Israel was forty years'. Using this as basis for your argument, you say that Jesus failed his mission because he died before he could reign for 40 years, and so returned in the person of Ang Sahng-hong, who died early 1985.

In the Gospel of Mark, Jesus is preparing his disciples for the time when he is no longer with them. He tells them in Mark 13:3-37 about what they should expect in that time: wars, famines, earthquakes, they will be tortured, and that many will come claiming bearing Jesus' name saying 'I am he!'. He also warns his disciples not to believe those who say 'Here is the Christ' or 'Look! There he is!' (v21-23). Jesus then goes on to tell his disciples , in v24-27, how he would be coming back - in clouds of great power and glory. Revelation 22:3-5 also tells us that when Jesus, the Lamb returns, he will reign forever.

You have been told that Ang is Jesus' second coming. Jesus says to be careful of those who come saying 'I am Jesus', and not to believe those who say 'Here is the Christ'. Ang has not come in clouds of great power and glory for the whole world to see. He came and died, and nobody knew. To top it off, Ang himself never claimed to be Jesus. This claim comes from a woman by the name of Jang Gil-ja, who after the death of Ang, proclaimed him to be Jesus, and herself to be God the Mother. Which bring us to our next point.

The two men I spoke to used Galatians 4:21-31 as proof text that the Bible talks about God the Mother. They talked about how the Jerusalem above is our mother, and because this 'Jerusalem' is 'above', therefore 'she' must be God. You were also telling me that in Revelation 22:17 the Bride mentioned there is God the Mother. The tracts that you handed out also used the following logic:

Premise 1: Everything that has a father has a mother
Premise 2: Jesus called God his father
Conclusion: There has to be God the Mother.

Let's start with Galatians.

Now Galatians is a letter written by Paul to a group of churches in Galatia. He was scolding them for so quickly leaving behind the teachings of Jesus to go back to following the Jewish law. Paul in Galatians 3 is reminding them that they cannot, no matter how hard they try, earn their way back to God. Galatians 4 is a continuation of Paul's appeal to them to stop their foolishness. He is reminding them that by trusting in Jesus to have died for their sins, they are now part of the children of promise (4:28), for their allegorical mother is a free mother (v26), and so they should not go back to being slaves to working for their salvation (v30-31). Given the context, I do not see how this text can be used to prove God the Mother.

In Revelation 22:17, who is the Bride? To answer that, you have to read from Revelation 21. She is the new Jerusalem (v2), who is the wife of the Lamb (v9). Who is the Lamb? This Lamb is introduced in Revelation 5:6, and is a direct reference to John 1:29, which is talking about Jesus, saying, "Behold, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!" Now if the Bride is supposed to be the Son's Mother, and Jesus is the Son, then are we talking about incest at a cosmic level?

The logic presented in your tract is also flawed. God and Creation, which one of these two sets the definition? Take for example: I have an abusive and hateful Father. Is therefore God the Father hateful and abusive? Or should God the Father be the definition of what real fatherhood is all about, and by measurement of that standard, my father is judged to have failed?

The very own person you were told to be Jesus himself denounced the teaching of God the Mother, and denounced the person who first introduced the teaching, Um Sooin in his book Problems with the New Jerusalem, the Bride and Women's Veils. He called her a 'false prophet' who 'attempted to gain power'.

Dearest friends,

You have seen the evidence pile up against the teachings of your 'church'. You have been working very hard to earn your place before God. I invite you to look to the Lord of the Sabbath, who promises to give you rest from the hard and endless work of trying to earn your place in heaven. Jesus, the Lord of the Sabbath invites you to rest and to trust only in the work that he has done in your place, at the Cross. 

If you continue to stay with this 'church', you will continue to be part of a people who tell lies about who Jesus really is, and who God really is. When God told the Israelites 'You shall not take the name of God in vain', he meant that you cannot misuse God's name. Saying something about God that is not true, and claiming that God said it, is using God's name in vain. And there is only one outcome for those who will not stop dragging God's name into the mud - God's rightful anger remains on you. 

For your sake, I beg you to think again about what you are doing.

Your Friend,
Shimron

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Farewell to SMACC2

My brothers and sisters,


I thank God when I remember that we are all sharing in the Gospel, partners in the service of the Kingdom. I thank God for the way that we have been called together, not by common denominators like hobbies, or educational background, race, or even social economic status, but by the blood of Jesus, for the sole purpose of the demonstration of His immense glory.


I am thankful for the many ways that you have allowed me to glimpse this glory in our service of each other. I am eternally grateful for those who had gone out of their way to befriend me when I was a newcomer, to those who opened up their lives to me, to those who kept me accountable, who grabbed me by the shoulders and shook sense into me when I needed it. I am also thankful for those who have served as Godly role models for parenting and caring for children. You have been my family here in KL, and a source of immeasurable encouragement to me.


If I can be of any encouragement before I part from you, I would want to remind you of the hope that you have received, and continue to stand in, lest your faith be in vain; that Jesus, the Christ died for the sins of His people, and that you have been justified and are being sanctified. It has colossal implications for every sphere and facet of our lives. No area of our lives should go without the power of this news burning through it. As such, continue to go bravely into that dark and messy night of human relationships and be raw and real with each other. Keep breaking past categories. None of that paiseh business. Sharpen each other into Christlikeness, helping each other struggle with sin. Serve each other boldly, holding back nothing. Be the family that Christ has ordained you to be that the World may see and know that you are His disciples.

Soli Deo Gloria.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Malaysian Christians Need to Learn the Difference Between 'Nice' and 'Good'


Malaysia is a country where there are as many world views as there are people groups. As it is no two world views are consistent with each other, but somehow Malaysians have managed to reach a point where, perhaps after being so tired of being fed segregationist propaganda from government machinery, they have created their own brand of unity. One where all Malaysians are the same, and their opinions and world views equally valid (unless you're a politician from an opposing side, then your views are irrelevant).

This is nothing new or uncommon. When conversations veer towards topics like race and religion, Malaysians like to throw catchphrases like "Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, Christianity... All same.  Religion is good. They all teach you to be good", or "Malay, Indian, Chinese... All same... Satu Malaysia!" Malaysians in general are nice. We like people to think we are nice, unlike how some politicians behave. These politicians like to raise divisive topics and make people unhappy. These politicians are not nice. We don't want to be like them. So instead of raising divisive topics, we say everything is the same, because we want to be nice.

The problem for Malaysian Christians is when we unconsciously adopt this amalgamation of world views along side our Christian world view. How is that a problem you ask? Well, for one, Christianity makes several unique claims which gives no space for all world views to hold equally valid positions. In fact, if you understand any one religion, you will find that if their world view is to be true, it immediately disqualifies the rest from being true. For the sake of example, one cannot say that both Islam and Christianity are true at the same time - a Muslim and a Christian will have largely contradicting views on how reality functions.

Which brings me to my main concern - that Malaysian Christians can sometimes be too caught up with wanting to be nice and forget that we were never called to be nice. Think about it. If Jesus was nice, he wouldn't have been crucified. The very message that he taught, and that we are to faithfully pass on has never been a nice message. It is a good message, no doubt, but not a nice one. The gospel message puts forth truth claims which challenge all other ideas of religion, and no one likes to hear that they're wrong.

If you found the gospel to be reliably true, and are trusting in Jesus' death and resurrection to save you from God's just anger, then grow a spine. Stand firm in what you know to be true, and preach it boldly even if the message is offensive. Don't 'preach the nice bits, and leave out the controversial bits' just because you want to be perceived as nice and accepting. Name heresies to be heresies, false teachers to be false teachers. Being nice does no one good, and in fact, will cost souls.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Children of Wrath, Like Literally

Once, there was this pastor visiting this church I used to attend in the early days of my university life. During his sermon, he made this statement: 'Children are sinful too!' At that point, I assumed that everybody there understood and agreed with the pastor. After all, everyone was guilty of rejecting the kingship of a God who had created this world, whether adult or child, and are under judgement for said rebellion; and this rebellion shows itself in many ways, but most of the time, it is about wanting ourselves to be the centre of the universe, whether it is in relationships with God, with other people, or even with the natural world around us. It was later that week, while I was talking to a girl from the same congregation about the sermon, where she told me in a very hurt tone, that she "couldn't believe that children were sinful". At that time I didn't say anything. I had no idea what children were like.

Today, almost four years down the road, with roughly the same amount of working experience with children, I think if I ever get the chance to relive that conversation, I would tell the girl that she obviously had never had to look after children for more than a quarter of an hour. In my three years with children even as young as six months, I have witnessed jealousy, rage, selfishness, self-righteousness, and manipulation. Although undeniably, they do have a great capacity for kind deeds, and the gift of a short memory for grievances, one can hardly say that they are the innocent, chubby angels from above. After all, like they say, we just only get better at hiding it when we grow up.

As I recount my experiences with children over the past three years, I am reminded of this article I read somewhere. Probably on the Gospel Coalition. Regardless, it was about Gospel centred parenting, where children need the Gospel as much as the adults. After all, do we not have a high priest who once was the infant in a manger, and the child at the temple? As much as he identifies with adult struggles with sin, he also identifies with the struggles of children with sin. In realising this, my heart is once again burdened with how I can share the good news of Jesus with these children, and I despair at the shortness of my arm. For how then will they call on him in whom they have not believed? And how are they to believe in him of whom they have never heard?And how are they to hear without someone preaching? And how are they to preach unless they are sent? Though the harvest is plentiful, the workers are few and overworked.

So, if you are thinking about areas of ministry you would like to help out with, let me encourage you to have children's ministry be one of them. No, it is and has never been limited to women only. In fact, the young boys would benefit lots from having a male figure setting an example. 

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

How Big is Your God?

"Thank you God for helping me find parking!"

On passing a test, "God is great!"

"If I get through this, all glory to You!"

"My washing machine broke down, and I prayed, and it started back up right away! God is so good!"

Comments like these does tend to pop up on my Facebook newsfeed, and I do overhear them in conversations. Don't get me wrong; I don't think there's anything wrong in thanking God for even the small things in life; we should. After all, Malaysian parking is so rare, they might as well call it an urban legend. I mean, after all, exams are so major - they define where you go and what you do for the rest of your life. My concern is just this: if the small things are all we thank God for and ask God for, aren't we turning Him into our personal secretary whose sole reason of existence is to solve problems for us? Aren't we making God a little too small than He actually is? Aren't we conveniently forgetting the Big Thing too?

So you didn't find parking. Is God less kind? So let's just say you failed your exam, or botched that crucial presentation. Is God less great? You didn't get through that rough spot in life as unaffected as you would like to. Does God get less glory? Your washing machine caught fire instead. Is God less good?

God is kind, great, and glorified, not because He solved your parking woes, or helped you through your exam. He is kind, great, and glorified because He himself, the God of Justice, became man so that he could bear his own terms of punishment for our rebellion against him, so that whomever trusted in His work of redemption on the cross didn't have to suffer that punishment, be declared right and gain adoption into His family. And all this the Father did, ultimately not for us, but for his Son, for their own glory, for
 'He is the image of the invisible God, the first born of all creation. For by him all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities—all things were created through him and for him. And he is before all things, and in him all things hold together.' 
(Col 1:15-17) 
We merely are but enjoying fringe benefits of the Father's love towards the Son.

When Paul writes to the church in Philippi, he writes to a church under severe persecution. Yet he tells them: 'rejoice in the Lord always; again I will say, rejoice. Let your reasonableness be known to everyone. The Lord is at hand; do not be anxious about anything, but in everything by prayer and supplication with thanksgiving let your requests be made known to God. And the peace of God, which surpasses all understanding, will guard your hearts and your minds in Christ Jesus.' (Phil 4:4-7) The reason Paul can so boldly tell them this is because they know that they've got the Big Problem settled - their impending judgement and eternal punishment for rebelling against the Ruler of the Universe has been dealt with. Therefore, even if they die in the most excruciating way possible (the Roman soldiers of the day were pretty good at that), they can rejoice and give thanks. 

So, keeping that in mind, let's give thanks, both for the small things, and the Big Thing, with the Big Thing informing how we give thanks and pray for the small things.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Untethered Morals and Logic

Where do I start? I've got several thoughts in my mind which I would like to get off my chest. They are in no way well thought through, polished pieces of genius, but mere rough sketches of my thoughts, recorded for posterity's sake, and they are as follows:

  1. Our culture today waves very eagerly, values which were once built on Biblical truths, but now are divorced from their roots. When you look at the attempts to justify how these values are self-sufficient, you see through the folly of their wisdom, and all you have left is merely an empty, hollow shell of flimsy morality. Take for example the value of a human life.The Bible teaches that man and woman were created with different roles, and declared them to be 'very good'. What you see here is a case where our worth as human beings are not dependent on the roles we play, or the skills we have, but rather on the external existence of someone from which our value is derived - both man and woman are declared to be 'very good', and that statement is backed by the death of Jesus on the Cross. However, when you deny the possibility of an external source of our value, ie God, the only other way you have to derive value is from within the system, and that may be many things, eg. possessions, skills, status, etc. Now, as a brief aside, worth is not a self-supporting concept. It is a relationship dependent concept, meaning that worth, or value, must come from somewhere. However, when you begin to work from within the system, your value as a human inadvertently begins to get tied-up with what you have or what you do, allowing the existence of a social hierarchy where one group of humans are legitimately superior to another group, given the proper context. Here is where the cheek of the human race can be seen: we loudly declare that all humans are equal, since we deny the idea that any one group of humans are superior to another, yet at the same time boldly deny the God from whom our equal value is derived from. We want the gifts, but not the Giver.
  2. Our culture, in the attempt to avoid considering the harsh possibility that there is a creator God who holds us responsible for our actions, have very cleverly announced that all 'truth' is truth. This is my other contention with our modern culture. If, for example A=>(G=H), and B=>(G=/=H), logically, one would conclude that A and B both cannot be true at the same time. However, our wisdom of today is like a child standing before the dessert tray deciding between red velvet, chocolate, or butter cake. She can't decide which one is best, so she eats all. At the same time. In the 'logic', or 'illogic' of this Zeitgeist, you can both be an elephant, and not be an elephant, all at the same time. This, in my opinion, is a cop-out from any and all earnest discussion. I fear that such an outlook to life may be a bigger disservice to our society as a whole, since if there is no longer any objective measure of truth, then the only way left to make sense of this reality is by using our own individual experience as a yardstick. As we turn to gaze deeper within ourselves for the validation of reality, we will inadvertently be increasingly isolated from people around us, since no other validation of reality matters any longer except our own. Academia will crumble, as the opinions of those who have spent years dedicating their life to better understand a single subject matter will now be as valuable as the thoughts of the clinically insane bum who lives under the bridge on the same matter. Perhaps I am merely naysaying, but perhaps I may be right. Who knows?

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Grace in Our Judiciary System

Two incidents have recently caught my eye. The first is the acquittal of a Malaysian national bowler from statutory rape charges on the account of him having a bright future. The second incident, which happened not too long after, is the similar acquittal of a 22 year old school dropout from statutory rape charges, also on the account of his future. Notably, there are differences in the two cases which have to be noted: in the latter case, the sexual act was consensual between both parties, while in the former, the man pleaded guilty.

However, what I found to be most interesting was not the cases themselves, but rather, the reaction towards these cases where offenders walk free from incarceration; and of all the reactions, the ones which strike me most are responses from Christians.

Many Christians were outraged at the fact that these offenders were allowed to walk off with less than a jail sentence, I myself included. What perversion of justice! How unfair to the victim! What was the judge thinking?! And then I realised something - I, of all people, as a Christian, should refrain from such outrage at the walking of such people. For was I not as they were, guilty? My charge was greater than what they were charged with. I was charged with rebellion against the King of Kings, for insubordination, for mutiny - of which I am deserving of death. I had no 'future' to appeal to, and even if I did, it was far from 'bright', but yet the Judge showed me grace in His mercy, and declared me righteous on the basis of his Son's substitutionary atoning death.

My thought is but this: If as Christians, we were shown such clemency, should we not expect such extra-judicial grace in our shadow of a judiciary system? Should we cry in outrage when one we deem to be guilty is pronounced by the judge to be otherwise? Then should we not cry in outrage at our own salvation? Should we not cry because we were not charged with what we deserved?

However, it is important to note that this picture is but an imperfect allegory of salvation. This is but a pale shadow of what true forgiveness is. True justice still demands for a price to be paid - somebody has to be punished for the crime. The Godhead did what no Earthly judge could do for any prosecuted - tear himself, a being who has been in perfect relationship with each other since eternity, apart to pay himself what the prosecuted could not pay. True justice is not lost in mercy, but instead is met together at the cross where Jesus dangled dying.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

The role doctrine plays in Christian living

1. Doctrine isn't an end to itself.
You don't get saved because you know your doctrine well. You also don't study doctrine for the sake of pursuing more knowledge.
Doctrine, instead, helps us understand, love, and obey Jesus.

2. A real saving relationship with Christ involves doctrine.
A person in a real relationship with Jesus comes to him and LISTENS to him. It is pretty much impossible to separate doctrinal truth and relational passion. Having amassed a huge store of doctrine, but not having a change in heart is faith without works - dead. On the other hand, you can't tell Jesus: "I'll sit real close to you so I can feel your love. Whoa, don't say anything! Just shhh! I just wanna feel your presence."

3. Knowing right doctrine isn't enough; we need to put them into practice.
If your life doesn't match up to the doctrine you hold, then you're like the fool who built his house on the sand - your life is built on doctrine which you don't believe in, which will collapse when the reality of life hits you.

*Doctrine (Latin: doctrina) is a codification of beliefs or "a body of teachings" or "instructions", taught principles or positions, as the body of teachings in a branch of knowledge or belief system.

For a more detailed look at the role of doctrine in a Christian's life, click here.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS