Glory of Zion International Ministries and Its Obsession with Jewish Tradition



Glory of Zion International Ministries
Glory of Zion International Ministries is an organisation based in Denton, Texas and headed by Charles "Chuck" Pierce.

Notable beliefs of the organisation are:
1. The view that the current geo-political nation of Israel is essential to the consummation of God's promises.
"As those who have been grafted into God’s covenant, we are called to stand with God’s covenant land. Every nation will be reconciled around this land."

2. The strong Jewish flavour to the entire organisation. In the book A Time to Advance that Pierce co-authors with Robert and Linda Heidler, the organisation's fascination with Judaism surfaces; the book is aimed to help the reader 'Understand[ing] the Hebrew Tribes and Months' and therefore "receive prophetic understanding of how the Lord orders [the reader's] steps throughout the year".

Click on the book title for a sample.

3. On-going revelation
http://www.gloryofzion.org/prophecy/index.php?pid=v9h576h7
Chuck Pierce claims to speak with revelation from God

The omission of mentioning sin in regards to Jesus' death is also worth taking into consideration.
"[Jesus] submitted Himself to the Father of creation and became a sacrifice upon a tree for all humankind. This liberated us from the curse of death and destruction."

Chuck Pierce and his 'ministry' encourages the observance of Jewish traditions, like the Rosh Hashanah, and the Feasts. The blowing of the shofar (a ram's horn commonly used in Jewish rites) is also a common element to Pierce's ministry.

While Pierce also claims apostleship and prophethood, these are claims that will not be challenged in the scope of this article. His Dominionism theology will also not be discussed. This article aims to address Glory of Zion's obsession with Jewish Tradition.

Christ, the Real Deal

For all the promises of God find their Yes in him. That is why it is through him that we utter our Amen to God for his glory. (2Cor 1:20)

Every shadow has an object that it points to. The shadow is never truly the object. In academia, the shadow is called the type, while the object is called the antitype.

The Old Testament was given as a beacon, pointing people ahead to something in the future. Eden, Adam, the Serpent Crusher, Babel, Abraham's seed, the Promised Land, the blessing for the whole world, Joseph, Moses, Israel, Joshua, the Tabernacle, the sacrifices, the Mosaic Law , the High Priest, the judges, Boaz, the kings, David, the Temple, the prophets, Cyrus, Mordecai, the Son of Man, the Suffering Servant, the Messiah. All these, and perhaps more, are types that find their fulfillment or reversal in Jesus, the antitype.

And he said to them, “O foolish ones, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken! Was it not necessary that the Christ should suffer these things and enter into his glory?” And beginning with Moses and all the Prophets, he interpreted to them in all the Scriptures the things concerning himself. (Luk 24:25-27)

So, if Christ is the fulfillment of everything in the Old Testament, then reintroducing elements of Jewish tradition in the effort to make our spiritual lives more authentic would be a step backwards, in the wrong direction.

Therefore let no one pass judgement on you in questions of food and drink, or with regard to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath. These are a shadow of the things to come, but the substance belongs to Christ. (Col 2:16-17)

Paul, in his letter to the Colossians, encourages them not to feel pressured by those who would insist that the Gentile Christians would have to keep the Jewish customs to be authentically Christian. Would we consider Paul to be mistaken, that we would return to observing shadows now that the real thing has come?

So put down your shofar, and cease your planning to celebrate the next Feast. Leave the shadows in the past where they belong and cling to Christ alone, whom those shadows point to.
                                                  -------------------------------------------
As for the one who is weak in faith, welcome him, but not to quarrel over opinions. One person believes he may eat anything, while the weak person eats only vegetables. Let not the one who eats despise the one who abstains, and let not the one who abstains pass judgement on the one who eats, for God has welcomed him. Who are you to pass judgement on the servant of another? It is before his own master that he stands or falls. And he will be upheld, for the Lord is able to make him stand.
                       
One person esteems one day as better than another, while another esteems all days alike. Each one should be fully convinced in his own mind. The one who observes the day, observes it in honour of the Lord. The one who eats, eats in honour of the Lord, since he gives thanks to God, while the one who abstains, abstains in honour of the Lord and gives thanks to God. For none of us lives to himself, and none of us dies to himself. For if we live, we live to the Lord, and if we die, we die to the Lord. So then, whether we live or whether we die, we are the Lord's. For to this end Christ died and lived again, that he might be Lord both of the dead and of the living.
(Rom 14:1-9)

Lest I be chided from 'passing judgement' - I am not questioning whether one who subscribes to Pierce's brand of theology is Christian or not (This passage was written with the Jewish convert - Gentile convert conflict in mind anyway). I raise issue with Pierce and his 'ministry' because his teaching unnecessarily weakens the faith of those who follow him, for he distracts from Jesus with his obsession with Jewish traditions - the very traditions which were supposed to point people to Christ.

Recommended Reading

Why All Christians Should Care About Biblical Theology, an article by Matt Tully
The Goldsworthy Trilogy, a book by Graeme Goldsworthy on how the Old Testament points to Christ.
God's Big Picture, a book by Vaughn Roberts on how the Bible fits together.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

A Review of the Sozo Ministry


A new form of ministry has arrived at our Malaysian shores. This Sozo ministry, or sometimes Sozo prayer finds its inspiration from the Greek word meaning to save or deliver. Details about the ministry/movement can be found here at their website.

To start, the guys at Sozo Ministry get it absolutely right - God is all about salvation, healing, and deliverance. Jesus' ministry after all was made up of mainly declaring the good news of salvation, then healing the sick and delivering the demon possessed.

However, that is about the only thing they get right.

Sozo ministry is a unique inner healing and deliverance prayer model in which the main aim is to get to the root of issues hindering your personal connection with the Father God, Jesus, and Holy Spirit.

It was birthed out of Bethel Church in Redding, California, and is a combination of select tools from various inner healing and deliverance ministries as well as revelations from years of ministry at Bethel Church.

As you encounter Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, you are brought into greater truth and are released from the impact of wounds and lies that hinder you from walking in the destiny to which you are called.

The above passage is taken from their mission description. A simple read through raises several points of concern, which are as follows:

1. ...personal connection with the Father God, Jesus, and Holy Spirit.
The biblical view of a Christian's relationship with the Godhead is far more robust than the insular relationship suggested above. Passages like Heb 10:23-25 clearly shows us that Christians are saved not to have our own special individual relationship with the Godhead. Instead, we Christians are saved to live out our salvation through our community life of encouraging each other to persevere, to love, and to serve.

2. ...
is a combination of select tools from various inner healing and deliverance ministries as well as revelations from years of ministry at Bethel Church.
As a professedly Christian ministry, the omissions from this section is telling. The role of Scripture is conspicuously missing. Compare this to an excerpt from the CCEF (Christian Counselling Education Fund) About page, which can be found here
Because God teaches us to see the world the way he sees it, and to see all things as they exist in relationship to him, we are committed to the complete trustworthiness and primacy of the Scriptures.
It makes you wonder what kind of 'select tools' they employ!

3. 'inner healing'
What on Earth is inner healing? The page provides no clear definition, except that it involves 'interactions with the Father God, Jesus, and Holy Spirit that bring restoration to spirit, soul, and body.' This is an issue because the phrase 'inner healing' is commonly associated with neo-pagan mysticism. Click here to see what I mean.

4. ...
you are brought into greater truth.
Hebrews 1:2 tells us that all we need to know about the Father, we see in the Son. 'Greater truth' implies that there is a special truth aside from what the Father has already revealed to us through the Son, that can only be accessed through Sozo prayer.

5. 
... that hinder you from walking in the destiny to which you are called.
Rom 8:29 tells us that our destiny as Christians is our conformity to Christ, and that nothing will keep God from achieving his purpose, not even suffering. To suggest otherwise removes a great assurance of hope for the suffering Christian, and replaces it with an unbearable burden instead - you are not doing enough to walk in your destiny!

6. 
Note: Counseling is not done during Sozo sessions. Sozo is a time of interacting with the Godhead in pursuit of freedom, intimacy, and wholeness.
Reading through the description, one comes to the conclusion that Sozo is either one of two things: humanistic counselling wearing Christian skin, or neo-pagan mysticism. This caveat at the end eliminates one option for us, leaving us with an unpleasant conclusion.

Which brings us to our conclusion. I am of the opinion that this Sozo ministry brings more harm to a Christian's growth that it does bring healing. To quote gotquestions.org on this issue, '
Sozo is much more closely related to mysticism and spiritism than to true intimacy with God. True intimacy with Him happens by illumination of the Word of God by the Holy Spirit and fellowship with Christ as we show love for the Father through obedience to and imitation of Him (Ephesians 5:1).'

Recommended Readings:
1. http://www.gotquestions.org/Sozo-prayer.html
2. Instruments in the Redeemer's Hands - a book by Paul Tripp on Christ centred counselling
3. Christless Christianity - an article by Michael Horton examining the movement of the church from religion built on the foundation of Christ to an inward looking experience.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

An Open Letter to the 'Church of God'

This is an open letter to the self-styled 'Church of God', a gathering of people from the World Mission Society Church of God, and the students of Elohim Academy.


Dearest friends,

I had a good opportunity to sit and speak to two of your men who had been diligently walking around Jaya Mall. We talked for a good hour or so, and in that time, I learnt many things about what your 'church' is all about.

Correct me if I am wrong, but the following two points are what defines your 'church':
1. Jesus' second coming is in the person of Ang Sahng-hong, a South Korean.
2. The existence of a being call God the Mother.

Let us begin with the person of Jesus, for that is where we both hold common ground. You have been told that David is a prophecy of Jesus, and it was necessary for Jesus to emulate David's life, specifically 1Kings 2:11, which says that 'And the time that David reigned over Israel was forty years'. Using this as basis for your argument, you say that Jesus failed his mission because he died before he could reign for 40 years, and so returned in the person of Ang Sahng-hong, who died early 1985.

In the Gospel of Mark, Jesus is preparing his disciples for the time when he is no longer with them. He tells them in Mark 13:3-37 about what they should expect in that time: wars, famines, earthquakes, they will be tortured, and that many will come claiming bearing Jesus' name saying 'I am he!'. He also warns his disciples not to believe those who say 'Here is the Christ' or 'Look! There he is!' (v21-23). Jesus then goes on to tell his disciples , in v24-27, how he would be coming back - in clouds of great power and glory. Revelation 22:3-5 also tells us that when Jesus, the Lamb returns, he will reign forever.

You have been told that Ang is Jesus' second coming. Jesus says to be careful of those who come saying 'I am Jesus', and not to believe those who say 'Here is the Christ'. Ang has not come in clouds of great power and glory for the whole world to see. He came and died, and nobody knew. To top it off, Ang himself never claimed to be Jesus. This claim comes from a woman by the name of Jang Gil-ja, who after the death of Ang, proclaimed him to be Jesus, and herself to be God the Mother. Which bring us to our next point.

The two men I spoke to used Galatians 4:21-31 as proof text that the Bible talks about God the Mother. They talked about how the Jerusalem above is our mother, and because this 'Jerusalem' is 'above', therefore 'she' must be God. You were also telling me that in Revelation 22:17 the Bride mentioned there is God the Mother. The tracts that you handed out also used the following logic:

Premise 1: Everything that has a father has a mother
Premise 2: Jesus called God his father
Conclusion: There has to be God the Mother.

Let's start with Galatians.

Now Galatians is a letter written by Paul to a group of churches in Galatia. He was scolding them for so quickly leaving behind the teachings of Jesus to go back to following the Jewish law. Paul in Galatians 3 is reminding them that they cannot, no matter how hard they try, earn their way back to God. Galatians 4 is a continuation of Paul's appeal to them to stop their foolishness. He is reminding them that by trusting in Jesus to have died for their sins, they are now part of the children of promise (4:28), for their allegorical mother is a free mother (v26), and so they should not go back to being slaves to working for their salvation (v30-31). Given the context, I do not see how this text can be used to prove God the Mother.

In Revelation 22:17, who is the Bride? To answer that, you have to read from Revelation 21. She is the new Jerusalem (v2), who is the wife of the Lamb (v9). Who is the Lamb? This Lamb is introduced in Revelation 5:6, and is a direct reference to John 1:29, which is talking about Jesus, saying, "Behold, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!" Now if the Bride is supposed to be the Son's Mother, and Jesus is the Son, then are we talking about incest at a cosmic level?

The logic presented in your tract is also flawed. God and Creation, which one of these two sets the definition? Take for example: I have an abusive and hateful Father. Is therefore God the Father hateful and abusive? Or should God the Father be the definition of what real fatherhood is all about, and by measurement of that standard, my father is judged to have failed?

The very own person you were told to be Jesus himself denounced the teaching of God the Mother, and denounced the person who first introduced the teaching, Um Sooin in his book Problems with the New Jerusalem, the Bride and Women's Veils. He called her a 'false prophet' who 'attempted to gain power'.

Dearest friends,

You have seen the evidence pile up against the teachings of your 'church'. You have been working very hard to earn your place before God. I invite you to look to the Lord of the Sabbath, who promises to give you rest from the hard and endless work of trying to earn your place in heaven. Jesus, the Lord of the Sabbath invites you to rest and to trust only in the work that he has done in your place, at the Cross. 

If you continue to stay with this 'church', you will continue to be part of a people who tell lies about who Jesus really is, and who God really is. When God told the Israelites 'You shall not take the name of God in vain', he meant that you cannot misuse God's name. Saying something about God that is not true, and claiming that God said it, is using God's name in vain. And there is only one outcome for those who will not stop dragging God's name into the mud - God's rightful anger remains on you. 

For your sake, I beg you to think again about what you are doing.

Your Friend,
Shimron

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Farewell to SMACC2

My brothers and sisters,


I thank God when I remember that we are all sharing in the Gospel, partners in the service of the Kingdom. I thank God for the way that we have been called together, not by common denominators like hobbies, or educational background, race, or even social economic status, but by the blood of Jesus, for the sole purpose of the demonstration of His immense glory.


I am thankful for the many ways that you have allowed me to glimpse this glory in our service of each other. I am eternally grateful for those who had gone out of their way to befriend me when I was a newcomer, to those who opened up their lives to me, to those who kept me accountable, who grabbed me by the shoulders and shook sense into me when I needed it. I am also thankful for those who have served as Godly role models for parenting and caring for children. You have been my family here in KL, and a source of immeasurable encouragement to me.


If I can be of any encouragement before I part from you, I would want to remind you of the hope that you have received, and continue to stand in, lest your faith be in vain; that Jesus, the Christ died for the sins of His people, and that you have been justified and are being sanctified. It has colossal implications for every sphere and facet of our lives. No area of our lives should go without the power of this news burning through it. As such, continue to go bravely into that dark and messy night of human relationships and be raw and real with each other. Keep breaking past categories. None of that paiseh business. Sharpen each other into Christlikeness, helping each other struggle with sin. Serve each other boldly, holding back nothing. Be the family that Christ has ordained you to be that the World may see and know that you are His disciples.

Soli Deo Gloria.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Nightmares during Christmas

Twas the night before Christmas, and I was all ready to try out a new Blackberry and Apple Streusel recipe. I spent the morning buying my flour and sugar, and got my mother to pick up some apples and lemons. We went later to pick out some blackberries at the supermarket, and I was all ready to start baking.

As I turned on the tap to wash my hands, I was greeted by a loud gurgle and a splutter. Heavens, no water?! On Christmas eve? How much worse could it get? In hindsight I should have not asked that question.

As I progressed through my recipe, I realised I needed a cake pan, and it was nowhere to be found. I spent a good half an hour searching for it before I found it. Hidden. Wrapped in a plastic bag. Under a pile of pasta, seaweed, and knicknacks. In a large storage box. In a cupboard.

Then as I proceeded to blitz the crumble mix, it wouldn't blitz. I could see the melting butter pooling at the bottom of the blender. Quickly, I tried pouring it the mix out, but too late! The mix was stuck at the bottom as a gooey gooey mess.I had to scrape it out and mix the rest of it by hand, chucking the bowl into the freezer every minute to let it firm up again.

From the moment I started making the streusel, it was a disaster. What a start to Christmas. Wasn't Christmas supposed to be all about being happy, and jolly, and just having that holiday cheer?

As I sat to think, while watching the streusel in the oven (finally), a question taunted me from the shadows of my mind. How do I reconcile suffering and disaster with Christmas? I mean, I'm sure that there are people suffering worse things than I did, on Christmas. Were we failing to embody the Spirit of the Season?

As I mulled over the thought, I realised I had overlooked something really important. Sure, Christmas is about rejoicing because Jesus was born, but what I had overlooked was the reason why Jesus had to be born as a little baby. Like my evening, but on a far larger scale, the world was messy, broken, and a disaster. It was precisely because the world was so, that Jesus had to be born, so that the world could be reconciled, healed, and mended through his death and resurrection.

Christmas, I realised, wasn't just for people who were merry. It was also for people who were suffering, for we now have a God who can identify with us, and promises us relief.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

A Song for the Fire Bearer

What is this fire
I feel burning inside?
It sure isn't the fires of hell.

When I see you love
and serve and give,
the flames are the hardest to quell.

That radiance bright,
bursting forth from your being;
Has set this hard heart aflame.

As I touch your soft hand
and hear my name whispered
I wonder if I'm not in a dream.

The fire ignited
would consume me whole,
to give and to give and to give;

Until I have given
all that I can
to you, my dearest betrothed.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

An Uncommon Event

I overslept this morning. Completely missed all my alarms. My consciousness was stirred by my housemate unlocking the front door; it always makes such a cacophony.

Still in the hazy dwam of being shocked awake, I fumbled around making sure I had everything I needed for work. Fresh socks, check. Fresh uniform, check. Lunch, check. Whoaaa!!! Almost forgot to comb my mess of  hair. Right, now off to work. Drat, where are my keys?

In the car I was thinking about how nicely cool my air conditioning was after I had spent that heart wrenching sum for repairs. Then as I drew up to the toll booth, I reached into my pocket for my wallet, and instead pulled out a roll of socks. A second check revealed no wallet.

The toll booth was inevitable. There was no way to turn back, and I had no spare change left in the car. The anticipation of driving up to the booth was like standing in line at the supermarket with a giant trolley of groceries, and your mother leaves you behind in the  line to get something she forgot, and the the person in front of you is almost done.

As my turn came, I wound down my window (newly repaired too) and gave the most charming smile I could muster, then explained my predicament. Turns out, they actually do have SOP for situations like this!

The kind lady walked out of the booth, and wrote me this slip, to be paid the next time I pass through.


I guess you learn something new everyday...

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS